Tricky Tuesday: Whats’ Fair for the Pig Is Fair for the Donkey Dontchakno

BOBO You Made Your Point – I Apologize

Earlier this week I went off on a political blog about the joker style photo of Barack Obama, shown above.

For the record we find it repulsive and hiddeous.

I must admit that I was totally insensed with the image when I saw it; even though I myself have seen and even posted some quite negative characterizations about Execs Bush and Cheney.

they however in my opinion earned it with their litany of evil deeds; most during their 8 years of world torture. some of which is still undergoing attempts at being undone. Iraq and Gitmo included.

Tonite when I saw this, I thought – hey this is kinda the same thing in a totally different way – President Obama is still portrayed in a somewhat unflattering terms; but not as a crazed criminal. this is just so crazy I don’t know which side of the fence I’m going to get stabbed with on this issue.

This is a Public Apology to The BOBO who I said mean things to last week. Honestly I really like Bob, as a guy without the politics. He’s just an average Joe.  BOB, I’m Apologizing for the mean comeback – even though I think you expected that from those of us who got pissed at your characterization of Barack Obama as the same as The Joker; or Heath Ledger, or George Bush. whatever.

He Was Elected and Is The President, So lets try to respect that please. Honestly Bob, I forget that you are quite young; and still have alot to learn about politics and people. it’s as though our paths crossed and you were supposed to have like myself,  the pedigree of the civil rights movement; the love generation of the 70’s; and the womanhood 80’s; experiences to use as your tools to reference before making blogging decisions.

but alas, Bobo You Don’t. maybe that’s why many of your readers tend to think of you as an obstinante Old White Guy who IS as much of a clown politically; as his blogging persona. Heavens To Betsy Ross Bob, stop acting like that please.

PARDON MOI, but after re-reading your piece – I believe that we should expect nothing more from you Mr. Bobo than you’ve demonstrated up to this point. apparently to want more, is obviously a frivilous waste of time on my part.

Pardon me for believing that because I’ve become more accepting of americanism’s flaws; that you would followsuit and become more accepting of it’s realities. it’s irrational and so democratic of me., sorry really Bob. It’s this brain, I can’t find the shut off switch – it just keeps working and working and.. well you know.

I am not backing down from my belief that the president deserves respect when he does right; and questions if he doesn’t. that’s why I think Former Execs Bush and Cheney deserve a Fair Trial. there’s no way they can walk away from this mountain of catastrophy. Not Even if We Post Psychedelic posters of  Brotha Barack  in College Smokin a KOOL Cigarette; on Every Corner, and hand out a handful of  California Chronic pills to the masses.

America may be a buncha tokers, but we ain’t stupid…

Mr President: Will You Please Legalize the Damn Hemp and Medical Marijuana so you can fix the  republicans wagons. pay em off, and tie em up; apparently they like it that way.  let a freak be a freak, and a politician be a politician. what’s fair for the donkey is fair for the Repiglicans dog gon-nit.

Tomorrow we post our Real Feelings about this 400% Increase in Death Threats toward President Obama. yes we said four hundred percent increase in presidential death threats. more than 30 per day.. presently.

We All Gotta Deal with this Issue of Fair Use Once and For All,

Everyone Please read this and lets all just think about this photo issue before we get any more wound up.

By Michael Masnick on just-can’t-get-away-from-it

We all know about the ongoing legal fight over Shepard Fairey’s iconic Obama poster, but it looks like there may be another potential battle over a different photo. After the election last year, Time Magazine published a bunch of photos of Obama in college, taken by a fellow student Lisa Jack, that had never been seen outside of a small group of people. One of the photos, showed Obama smoking a cigarette. It’s probably not a huge surprise that a marijuana legalization group, NORML, has modified the image to create a poster. You can see the two juxtaposed here:

Not surprisingly, Jack is not at all happy about the use of the photo, leading to yet another set of questions about fair use:

“They do not have my permission,” said Jack, a psychology professor in Minnesota. These photos “are absolutely not to be used in this way. … I really made a grand effort to do this properly, and I’m very irritated. If I’d wanted these to be used for political purposes, I’d have sold them to Hillary years ago.”

Now, of course you can appreciate her feelings on this, in that she doesn’t want her photo used this way, but that doesn’t necessarily mean it’s not legal. And, even though it’s buried at the end of the article, Jack later admits that “it’s really cool” that her image is considered “iconic” enough to use in that manner. The real question is whether or not Jack will actually do anything about this. Copyright law is not designed to be used to stifle speech (especially political speech), but we could soon see yet another fair use battle over a famous Obama image.

Google Buzz
Did you like this? If so, please bookmark it,
tell a friend
about it, and subscribe to this blog RSS feed.
  • Share/Bookmark

These Stories are from the Australian Herald – since the us papers are not posting as much as quickly. for the record, we don’t know if Michael was a Drug Addict; but if he was, then why did he pass the pre concert physical just a few months ago ?

also how could he have covered up this type of drug abuse for this many years, let alone decades? why was he able to get all these scripts from pharmacies if there is a narcotics tracking law in place in pharmacies in the us ? not much about this makes sense to us.

especially the reports that he couldn’t sing anylonger.. NO WAYYYY.
you sift through the few pieces we posted as there are loads out there on Michaels’ tragic death; and now apparently very depressed life.

If we could just all learn to accept that celebrities are people too; and that they deserve a life and privacy. they deserve to be free to deal with their problems and to resolve their issues without prejudice from fans; and especially the media.

the most reports on negative issues seem to be originating from TMZ in the Michael Jackson Death; so for the time being we’re just gonna see what more they do, as they seem to be stirring the pot quite a bit, and not with the best spoon.

God Rest His Soul, Finally

King of Pop Michael Jackson dethroned by drugs

David Murray and agencies

June 29, 2009 12:00am

THE brilliant showman and his tortured private life were there for all to see during Michael Jackson’s final 12 hours.

The night before he died, the King of Pop rolled back the years with a high-energy rehearsal for his 50-date London concert series.

Director Kenny Ortega said Jackson was “beaming with gladness”.

“There were a couple of times when Michael stood at my side and we looked at the stage together and were just beaming with gladness,” Ortega said.

Promoter Randy Phillips, who signed Jackson up for the concerts, chimed in: “It was fantastic, he was so great. I got goosebumps.”

What everyone knew at his final rehearsal, but dared not say, was that the 50-year-old superstar was in an almost permanently medicated state.

When he returned to his rented $75,000-a-month house late on Wednesday evening, he complained of being ill.

A little after 10am the following day, he stirred uneasily beneath the covers of his Louis XIV-style bed after another narcotic-induced attempt to sleep, sources told London’s Daily Mirror.

The tormented superstar had barely been able to muster two consecutive hours’ sleep in recent weeks – such was his terror of his comeback shows and his hopeless addiction to prescription drugs.

The singer felt woozy and disoriented – the cocktail of pills, vitamin jabs, uppers and downers to regulate his ailments and fragile mental state had taken an unbearable toll.

His weight was down to about 60kg, accentuating the frailness of his 1.8m frame and making those around him wonder how he could perform one show, let alone 50.

He was kept going by an increasingly dangerous mix of seven prescription drugs and vitamin shots, including anti-anxiety drugs Xanax and Zoloft and painkiller Demerol.

Former nanny Grace Rwaramba says she regularly pumped Jackson’s stomach clear of a cocktail of drugs.

Ms Rwaramba said in his final tormented years, Jackson was bingeing on up to eight drugs a day, including powerful painkillers.

“I had to pump his stomach many times. He always mixed so much of it,” she said.

“There was one period that it was so bad that I didn’t let the children see him. He always ate too little and mixed too much.”

So concerned was she about the singer’s drug use that she contacted his mother, Katherine, and sister, Janet, in an effort to help him.

She said Jackson cut her off when she confronted him about his drug use.

“We tried to do an intervention. It was me, Janet, his mother. I co-ordinated it. He was so angry with me.

“He screamed at me: ‘You betrayed my trust.’ He didn’t want to listen.”

Jacko had been punishing himself with six-hour intense rehearsals four times a week.

Comedian Ed Alonzo, who was at the final rehearsal, said: “He looked great and had great energy.

“He wasn’t singing at full level, but it was as beautiful as ever. He went from one number to the other: ‘Let’s do that again’.”

Sound engineer Johnny Caswell said Jackson was frail but approached the rehearsals with boundless energy.

Lighting director Patrick Woodroffe agreed: “He was frail, but when he arrived for rehearsal something extraordinary seemed to happen.

“He came on stage at 9pm and we all looked at each other and there was something that said that he really had it. He came on stage and was electric.

“It was like he had been holding back and suddenly he was performing as everyone remembered him at his peak.”

A source insisted that Jackson had passed all insurance medicals required for the tour. But his former nanny hit out at plans for Jackson to perform 50 shows in London, believing he was unaware of the schedule.

Ms Rwaramba said: “I told him: ‘Fifty performances! What are you doing?’ He said ‘I only signed for 10′.

“He didn’t know what he was signing. He never did.”

Michael Jackson was unable to sing ahead of concert tour

UPDATE 10.25pm: MICHAEL Jackson was so unwell he could no longer sing, even though he was due to play dozens of comeback concerts, according a press report.

According to a report in Britain’s Daily Mail, Jackson would have been unable to sing at any of his 50 concerts scheduled in London over coming months.

The tabloid quoted an aide to the star as saying that Jackson was able to stand after recent medical treatment, and would even be able to dance “once he gets in better shape”.

“He just can’t sing,” said the aide, adding that Jackson would have to lip-synch to get through the show.

“Nobody will care, as long as he shows up and moonwalks.”

The report also said that Jackson had been offered well over $120 million to play Las Vegas for six months.

“He said no, but his people are trying to force it on him. He’s that close to losing everything,’ said the source.

Earlier, it was revealed that Jackson was virtually bald, riddled with needle wounds and weighed just 51kg when he died, according to a leaked autopsy report.

The Sun said Jackson’s stomach held only pills and his body was scarred by at least 13 cosmetic surgery operations.

The needle holes were a legacy of Jackson’s addiction to painkillers, injected three times a day “for years” The Sun, which has obtained the details from a leaked autopsy, said.

Pathologists said Jackson was wearing a wig which covered just “peach fuzz” on his head and that several of his ribs were broken as a result of frantic attempts to revive him after he suffered a heart attack in his Los Angeles apartment on Friday.

Michael’s family and fans will be horrified when they realise the appalling state he was in,” a source told The Sun.

Experts also expressed their amazement at the way Jackson was treated on his death bed, with one of four attempts to inject adrenaline into his heart missing its target and noticeable damage caused by oxygen masks and tubing inserted during resuscitation attempts.

The star’s personal physician Dr Conrad Murray is also under fire for attempting to resuscitate Jackson on his bed, rather than face-up on a hard surface as per basic CPR guidelines, a mistake which could have cost doctors “vital minutes”.

Despite Jackson’s condition, the preliminary examination also found he was recovering well from a skin cancer operation.

The New York Post reports that a rehearsal for his scheduled London shows was filmed the day before his death and will be released as part of a tribute DVD.

Meanwhile, the mother of two of his children has claimed Jackson is not actually their father, saying “I was his thoroughbred”.

In an interview with the News of the World, Ms Rowe, the mother of Prince, 12, and Paris, 11, said the children were conceived by artificial insemination from an anonymous donor.

Ms Rowe was a receptionist at a Beverly Hills dermatology clinic when Jackson told the world he was expecting his first child with her in 1996.

“Michael was divorced, lonely and wanted children. I was the one who said to him, ‘I will have your babies’,” Ms Rowe said.

“I offered him my womb – it was a gift. It was something I did to keep him happy.

Ms Rowe said she was “impregnated” like one of the mares she now keeps on her property, saying: “I was just the vessel. It wasn’t Michael’s sperm.”

“It’s just like I impregnate my mares for breeding. It was very technical,” she said.

“Just like I stick the sperm up my horse, this is what they did to me. I was his thoroughbred.”

Ms Rowe said she was never a good mother and did not want custody of the children.

“I got paid for it, and I’ve moved on. I know I will never see my children again.”

The couple married at the Sheraton Hotel in Sydney in November 1996 while Rowe was pregnant with Prince.

Ms Rowe, now 50, said she never had sex with Jackson throughout their marriage and parenthood and that their entire relationship was a sham.

She also told the NOTW that Jackson wanted nothing more to do with her after the painful second birth left her unable to have any more children.

She said it was at that stage the Jackson ended their relationship and paid her $9 million over nine years in exchange for custody of the children.

Speculation is now mounting over who would take care of Jackson’s children, with the most likely candidates now his 80-year-old mother Katherine and the children’s nanny, 42-year-old Grace Rwaramba.

A lawyer for the late singer’s family today said that grandmother Katherine wanted to be the children’s guardian.

“She will seek custody of the children. She loves them dearly,” Londell McMillan said on the sidelines of the Black Entertainment Television awards in Los Angeles.

Katherine Jackson has been looking after the children since the sudden death of their superstar.

“(Michael’s) children are in great care with Mrs Jackson,” Mr McMillan said.

“They’re in a loving environment. She’s a great grandma.

“I couldn’t think of anyone better for these children than a grandma like Miss Katherine Jackson and the loving support of family of the Jacksons.”

Mr McMillan said the Jacksons had not yet seen the late superstar’s will and was unable to confirm if one even exists.

He said if Jackson had not left a will, his assets would go to his next of kin under California law.

The mother of Jackson’s third child, Prince II, has always remained a mystery.

Meanwhile, a lawyer for the doctor who was with Jackson when he died said the singer collapsed in front of his eldest son, who thought his father was joking around – but soon stood “in a trance” watching frantic efforts to revive him

MICHAEL Jackson’s children asked to see their father’s body after they were told he was dead, it was revealed.

Edward Chernoff – lawyer to Dr Conrad Murray who was at Jackson’s home when the star collapsed – said he consulted a psychologist when the children asked to see the body.

Prince Michael Joseph Jackson, 12, Paris-Michael Katherine Jackson, 11, and Prince Michael Jackson II, 7, were placed in the temporary care of their grandmother, Katherine Jackson, by a Los Angeles judge.

A 2002 will by Michael Jackson divides his estate between his mother, three children and one or more charities, the Wall Street Journal reported last night.

But his father, Joseph Jackson, apparently does not feature, the story said.

Police tracing drugs that may have killed Michael Jackson

THE mystery over Michael Jackson’s death took a dramatic turn after police began tracing the drugs believed to have killed him.

Prescriptions appear to have been written in several names – including members of his entourage.

This raises the prospect the 50-year-old singer set up an illegal supply chain to satisfy a dependency on painkillers his doctor would not prescribe.

Inquiries are focusing on a bodyguard who was at the Los Angeles mansion where the star collapsed on Thursday.

It is now known his doctor claims not to have been able to make an emergency 911 call because he couldn’t remember the address.

The inquiry was being conducted against a backdrop of increasing anger from Jackson’s family as they struggle to arrange his funeral, launch a legal battle over his money, music and children, and try to unravel what took place in the 12 hours before his death.

The bodyguard, in his 20s, was one of up to 15 individuals often staying at Jackson’s mansion. He shared it with a circle of aides, friends and Nation of Islam minders.

If it can be proved drugs were obtained for Jackson in someone else’s name it would become a serious criminal matter. It could also go some way to answering questions about what happened.

The TMZ celebrity news website reported that a “drug overdose” was the most likely cause of death.

A funeral date has yet to be set. The family is waiting to hear details of a second, private autopsy.

Dr Conrad Murray denied giving Jackson the drugs believed to have caused a cardiac arrest, insisting he never prescribed or gave Jackson either Demerol or Oxycontin.

Dr Murray said that when he found Jackson in bed, he still had a pulse. He tried to revive him but struggled to find anyone at the mansion to help him call 911, his lawyer Edward Chernoff said.

Once he realised cardiopulmonary resuscitation was not working, he dialled 911 on his mobile phone.

But Dr Murray, who moved into the house weeks ago as Jackson’s personal physician, says he did not know the exact address. None of the house phones worked “for privacy reasons”, so he ran round looking for help.

A security man, Mr Chernoff said, eventually dialled 911.

CPR, he said, was done for 25 to 30 minutes before emergency teams arrived. Their efforts also failed.

Dangerous Drug Found in Jackson Home

Posted Jun 30th 2009 11:39PM by TMZ Staff

Michael JacksonSources tell TMZ an extremely dangerous and potent drug used for surgical anesthesia was found at Michael Jackson’s house after he died.

We’re told the drug Propofol was discovered at the residence. The drug is used to put people under anesthesia before surgery. It is an extremely powerful drug that is only available to medical personnel. As one source said, “There is no conceivable way this drug can be properly prescribed for home use.”

The drug can only be administered with an IV. Interestingly, Propofol burns and the drug Lidocaine is used to reduce the pain associated with the Propofol injection. As we first reported, Lidocaine was found near Jackson’s body.

One of the major side-effects of Propofol is cardiac arrest if it’s taken in combination with narcotic painkillers, however, Propofol is so powerful it can stop someone’s heart on its own.

A registered nurse has come out and said Jackson begged her for the drug Diprivan — the brand name for Propofol. She says he needed it for insomnia but she declined to supply it.

Sources say the drug is so inappropriate and reckless for home use, if a doctor facilitated it for Jackson, he or she could be prosecuted for manslaughter.

Google Buzz
Did you like this? If so, please bookmark it,
tell a friend
about it, and subscribe to this blog RSS feed.
  • Share/Bookmark

Tricky Thursday BadGalsRadio Public Service Announcement

From: The Desk of Mama ASID – The defender of Anti Slackness Intellectual Development on a Global Scale

Date: Erryday – cause we always on the job

Good Day To You Mr President :

Sir, this is just not what WE had agreed to. I know you know that WE all know the difference between changing your mind and being afraid..  If You Scurd Mr. President – Call Black Jesus, He Got You..



Mr President, please study this picture very closely, because I can assure you that if you do not release these torture photos; this picture will include you next go round.. in a similarly attired and mocked fashion.

Make No Mistake Mr President, WE Are The Deciders; and We Want the Pictures.

FT.com / US & Canada – Obama U-turns on detainee abuse photo release.

Obama U-turns on detainee abuse photo release

By Demetri Sevastopulo and Andrew Ward in Washington

Published: May 13 2009 19:04

Barack Obama on Wednesday reversed his previous decision to release hundreds of photographs of American soldiers abusing detainees, in a major policy U-turn that was condemned by civil rights groups.

Speaking on the White House lawn, the US president said the photos would endanger the lives of US troops and have a “chilling effect” on future investigations into detainee abuses.

The Pentagon was slated to release the photographs later this month, five years after the emergence of images of US soldiers abusing detainees at Abu Ghraib shocked the world.

“The publication of these photos would not add any additional benefit to our understanding of what was carried out in the past by a small number of individuals,” said Mr Obama.

“In fact, the most direct consequence of releasing them…would be to further inflame anti-American opinion and to put our troops in greater danger.”

Mr Obama originally decided to release the images last month after his lawyers concluded there was no strong argument to resist a court order. Robert Gibbs, White House press secretary who last month said it was ”hopeless” to appeal the court order, on Wednesday said Mr Obama had ordered his team to appeal the court order with a new argument based on national security concerns.

The White House denied that Mr Obama was capitulating to pressure from US military commanders who objected to the release of the images. Robert Gates, defence secretary, had also argued that the release of the images could endanger US troops in the war zones.

While the White House insisted that the reversal was motivated solely by concern for the safety of troops rather than political factors, critics accused Mr Obama of reneging on the commitment made on his first full day in office to bring more transparency to government.

“I will hold myself as president to a new standard of openness,” he said at the time. “Information will not be withheld just because I say so.”

UH RUHHHH.. WTF Did He Just Say ?? Somebody Get His Ears Tested, and then bring out them headlines of his pingpong; before he begins his immediate treatment with Aricept, cause he ain’t thinking clearly..

The American Civil Liberties Union, which brought the legal case that produced the court order, lambasted Mr Obama for adopting the “stonewalling tactics and opaque policies of the Bush administration”.

“If the Obama administration continues down this path, it will betray not only its promises to the American people, but its commitment to this nation’s most fundamental principles,” said Anthony Romero, executive director of the ACLU.

“President Obama has said we should turn the page, but we cannot do that until we fully learn how this nation veered down the path of criminality and immorality, who allowed that to happen and whose lives were mutilated as a result. Releasing these photos – as painful as it might be – is a critical step toward that accounting.”

Republicans who had strongly criticised another recent decision by Mr Obama to release the controversial Bush administration “torture memos” praised his reversal on the photographs.

“I agree with the president that the release of these photos would serve no purpose other than to put our troops in greater danger,” said Mitch McConnell, Senate Republican leader. “The president made the right decision and I applaud him for it.”

SMDH, WTF Is In The Water in DC ? Now He’s Actin Like A Repiglican ? Awwww Helll Nawwww, this just can’t be. do we have a gemini in the white house ? please tell me we don’t. oh lawd Black Jesus Help Us Quick..

Releasing the photographs would have added further fuel to debate over the treatment of detainees, amid continued fallout from March decision in March to declassify the “torture memos” which authorised use of “enhanced interrogation techniques” after the September 2001 attacks.

Publication of the memos thrust the issue of torture and terrorism back up the political agenda and gave Republicans an opportunity to attack Democrats for alleged softness on national security.

Nancy Pelosi, the Democratic House speaker, has become caught in the crossfire after revelations that she was briefed about the authorisation of waterboarding and other harsh forms of interrogation in 2002 but made no objections at the time.

Republicans have accused Ms Pelosi of hypocrisy and are pressing for hearings to find out precisely what she and other Democrats knew when about the treatment of detainees.

The pressure of Ms Pelosi shows how Democrats have been put on the defensive over terrorism, while Republicans have been emboldened by opinion polls showing that most voters have little appetite for probing past abuses and are uneasy about Mr Obama’s decision to shut down the Guantanamo Bay detention facility.

Harsh interrogation techniques ineffective,’ former FBI agent testifies

A former FBI special agent who interrogated senior al-Qaida captives told the Senate Judiciary Committee on Wednesday that harsh interrogation techniques are “ineffective, slow and unreliable,” and disputed claims by former Vice President Dick Cheney and others that they helped uncover major terrorist plots.Ali Soufan, a veteran FBI investigator, said that CIA officials and others responsible for the extreme measures inflated the program’s successes and downplayed the consequences of physical abuse.

“The situation was, and remains, too risky to allow someone to experiment with amateurish, Hollywood-style interrogation methods that in reality taints sources, risks outcomes, ignores the end game and diminishes our moral high ground,” Soufan said.

“It was one of the worst and most harmful decisions made in our efforts against al-Qaida,” he said.

Former State Department official Philip Zelikow, who in 2005 was Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice’s point man in a battle to overhaul the Bush administration’s detention and interrogation policies, joined Soufan in criticizing the use of techniques such as waterboarding, a form of simulated drowning that’s widely considered torture.

Zelikow said the U.S. could combat terrorism without resorting to extreme methods.

“Others may disagree,” he said. “The government, and the country, needs to decide whether they are right. If they are right, our laws must change, and our country must change. I think they are wrong.”

Cheney has argued that the now-defunct CIA program, which included a global network of secret prisons, produced valuable intelligence that thwarted terror attacks and saved American lives.

Cheney, who’s scheduled to give a major speech on the subject next week at the American Enterprise Institute, a conservative Washington policy organization, has called for the release of two classified CIA memos that he says detail the program’s successes.

However, Sen. Russ Feingold, D-Wis., a member of the Senate Judiciary and Intelligence committees, said he’s seen the two documents and they don’t prove Cheney’s case.

Soufan’s testimony apparently was the first public appraisal by a senior U.S. government interrogator who dealt directly with suspected terrorists in CIA custody.

It came a month after President Barack Obama released four Bush-era Justice Department legal memos justifying methods that included confinement boxes, sleep deprivation and slamming detainees into walls. That reopened the debate over whether top Bush officials should be investigated and prosecuted for their actions.

Adding to the drama, Soufan testified from behind a screen where the senators, but not the audience, could see him. Since at least one photo of Soufan is available on the Internet, the reason for the security measures wasn’t readily apparent.

Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., who’s also an Air Force Reserve lawyer, said the Bush administration erred in its reading of the law but argued that harsh interrogation techniques sometimes produce valuable information.

He challenged Soufan to dispute that.

“I can only speak to my experience,” the former FBI agent replied.

“That’s the point, isn’t it?” Graham retorted.

Soufan was a lead FBI interrogator of Abu Zubaydah, one of the first major al-Qaida figures to be captured after the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks. The initial interrogation of Zubaydah, using the bureau’s traditional, rapport-building techniques, yielded valuable intelligence, including the role of Khalid Sheikh Mohammed as the mastermind of the Sept. 11 attacks, he said.

Then-CIA director George Tenet congratulated the interrogators – until he learned that they were from the FBI, not the CIA, Soufan said. A team from the CIA’s Counterterrorism Center that included a government contractor quickly replaced him and his colleagues. They introduced harsh interrogation techniques, and Zubaydah’s cooperation stopped, Soufan said.

After complaints from officials in Washington about the dried-up intelligence flow, Soufan and colleagues reverted to the traditional approach, and Zubaydah began talking again.

To bolster the Democrats’ case against torture, Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse, D-R.I., released summaries of Soufan’s interrogations of another al-Qaida figure, Abu Jandal, who was a bodyguard to Osama bin Laden. Without being tortured, Jandal divulged intimate details and personal histories of bin Laden’s inner circle, the 100 pages of documents appear to show.

The hearing took place amid an escalating political fracas over what congressional Democrats knew at the time about the CIA program. Republicans say that documents call into question House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s contention that she wasn’t briefed about waterboarding.

Zelikow called the CIA program “a collective failure, in which a number of officials and members of Congress (and staffers), of both parties, played a part.”

Zelikow wrote a classified February 2006 memo challenging the legal reasoning of the Justice Department’s Office of Legal Counsel. The White House responded by ordering copies of the memo destroyed, but Zelikow said his six-page document has been retrieved from State Department files and is undergoing declassification review.

ON THE WEB

The Senate Judiciary Committee hearing: http://judiciary.senate.gov/hearings/hearing.cfm?id=3842

So to wrap this up, we’d just like to ask you to take a moment and consider what this all means.

if the All of Torture Photos and All the Torture Memos are not released, that means in essence President Obama is going back on his promise of Transparency; and Truth.

He Promised to Get to the Facts in the Torture and Terrorism Cases. This is what we HIRED Him To DoHe Works For Us effectively as our CEO, and We Need to make demands as Stockholders of this terribly unbeholding beast that we allow to run our lives, with tacit approval.

Isn’t It Time Transparency In Government was The Rule not the Exception ?

What Do You Think ? Leave Us a Few of Your Thoughts, as this will become a part of our series “Neocons on Parade”.  it will be released on it’s own homesite within the coming weeks.  WE Know that Eric Holder has a special interest in certain tags; and we use them to make sure that this story and others in this series are reaching the very eyes, that need to see and know.

TELL EM, What You Think;  Because They are behaving awfully shady, on this whole Torture Photo Issue. Don’t Froget that Prosecution is still up in the Air. When is Guantanamo Bay Closing ? have we got a date for Troop Withdrawl from Iraq ?

So Mr Obama – and Mr Holder, When Will the American People Get Justice ?

Google Buzz
Blog Widget by LinkWithinDid you like this? If so, please bookmark it,
tell a friend
about it, and subscribe to this blog RSS feed.
  • Share/Bookmark
  
Get Adobe Flash playerPlugin by wpburn.com wordpress themes