Chucky T is 369; NOW WHAT Ya Cannibal ?

This is a waste of a good vest. he doesn’t need it. remember he said he could bounce bullets. This for those of you who have forgotten – This is the punk formerly known as Chucky T.

this hizz-ooh used to run shit into the ground in Liberia. he single-handedly started the wars that caused the rush on Blood Diamonds.. Yeah That Biaaaa-otch, with the emphasis on Biatch.

Inside Story-Charles Taylor – 03 June 07 – Part 1

If we had it our way, we’d be stewin his head right now and feedin phiranahs all over the amazon. he is too nasty to be fed back to the earth. because surely he would be toxic to anything he touches for at least a million years.

Inside Story-Charles Taylor – 03 June 07 – Part 2

this is the one person in the world; that if allowed, I would personally trade places with the guards for just 5 minutes, to let him have all my pent up sexual rage. I would fuck him up, let alone Kill His Remains.

I would send his DNA Back to L. Ron Howard and John Travolta, because he is 1000% Certified DEMON. (nuff respect scientologist, y’all know how to deal with ya demons; which is why I’d send his ass back to y’all, cause I know ya lookin for his demonic ass.)

There is no one on this earth, I think I dislike more than Chucky T.
as far as I am concerned he is the Devils Poodle; and needs to be Pit Bull Fucked. this man doesn’t deserve a trial. shoot him now. use one bullet and make it from a 50′ caliber positioned exactly 13 feet east of his head. let him begin to run so it would resemble what he did to millions of west africans.

Victims remember Taylor’s brutal rule – 14 Jul 09

It’s Time for this Farce of a Trial to be over – deliver him to My House and I’ll call my friends. believe me, we can feed this lil Cannibal; – back to the masses. no fava beans required.

Charles Taylor to Speak at War Crimes Trial

THE HAGUE — For months, Charles Taylor, the former president of Liberia, has watched in silence as witnesses have passed through the courtroom, telling stories of mind-boggling violence, even cannibalism. His face remained blank, eyes hidden behind tinted glasses, as women spoke of rape and villagers told how their hands or their arms had been severed with axes.

Only when longtime allies appeared has Mr. Taylor seemed agitated, passing messages to his defense team, demanding to challenge the accounts.

On Tuesday, Mr. Taylor, the first African leader to be tried for war crimes, will break his silence as he takes the stand to defend himself. His lawyers say that his testimony may go on for weeks, given the wide range of the charges of war crimes and crimes against humanity.

The prosecution, which has rested its case, has charged that he armed and commanded rebel groups to bolster his influence in West Africa and to seize a swath of neighboring Sierra Leone, in particular its diamond-mining areas.

His indictment holds him accountable for the rebels’ barbaric methods as they pillaged, killed, raped, used drug-crazed children as soldiers and hacked off limbs, ears or noses to subdue civilians.

Opening the defense case on Monday, Courtenay Griffiths, the lead lawyer, said that Mr. Taylor was not “an African Napoleon” bent on taking over a region, but a broker of peace who would exonerate himself when he gave his account.

As many as 200,000 people died in the decade of fighting, and Mr. Taylor’s war strategies are said to have affected many more in Liberia, his home country, but only crimes in Sierra Leone between 1996 and 2002 are within the mandate of the court.

For Mr. Taylor’s trial, the international judges of the United Nations-backed Special Court for Sierra Leone are sitting in The Hague to avoid potential unrest in Freetown, Sierra Leone’s capital, where the court is based. The prosecution has brought 91 witnesses, many of whom made a 7,000-mile round trip to The Netherlands.

“We didn’t have documents and orders signed by Taylor, so we needed much circumstantial evidence,” said Stephen J. Rapp, the court’s chief prosecutor. “But key players close to Taylor have testified and painted the complex picture. Taylor was in another country, it was not his country’s army, he was not at the scene of the crimes. But we have direct evidence of his orders and communications.”

Mr. Rapp said that about a dozen “insiders” — witnesses once close to Mr. Taylor, whose testimony had been crucial — had been moved to other countries and given new identities. Several important witnesses had declined to testify because they had been threatened, he said.

The horrors of the Sierra Leone war have frequently perturbed the solemn setting of The Hague courtroom, with its officers in black robes with neatly starched white bibs and its crimson-robed judges high on the dais. At times, witnesses on the stand gesticulated with amputated limbs, swaddled in bandages. Or take the small but awkward incident on the day when Mustapha Mansary, a villager, came to testify. Rebel gangs had hacked off both of his hands.

The defense lawyer began: “Mr. Witness, can I ask you, can you read and write English?” Mr. Mansary listened to the translation, and then he held up his two stumps. “I have no hands to write anything,” he said.

“I appreciate that; my apologies,” the lawyer said.

At other times, witnesses described scenes of incomprehensible cruelty.

A rape victim who testified under the name “064” described the day a gang of rebels mutilated and killed many adults and children in the village of Foendor, among them members of her family, including her two children. After nine children and the adults had been decapitated, Tamba Joe, the gang leader, ordered her to look for her people. Their severed heads were put in a sack.

“They gave me the heads to carry,” the woman said. “But at first I couldn’t.”

A man was told to help her carry the sack, dripping with blood. When they got to Tombudu, the next village, the rebels ordered all the heads thrown into a pond. The heads of her two children were among them, she said.

No one knows exactly how many people were killed or maimed in the civil war of the 1990s. Human rights groups have said that close to 4,000 amputees have not survived. Up to 3,500 amputees are believed to be still alive. Numerous former child soldiers are still in rehabilitation homes.

During the trial, the magnitude of the atrocities has not been in dispute. But the prosecution and the defense have described the case as legally complicated. The defense lawyer, Mr. Griffiths, said that the prosecution must prove Mr. Taylor’s effective control over the rebel groups and that demonstrating influence or assistance was insufficient. “The case is all about linking the crimes to Mr. Taylor, but the evidence has been riddled with inconsistencies,” Mr. Griffiths said.

Mr. Rapp, the chief prosecutor, insists that Mr. Taylor’s criminal responsibility has been more than demonstrated with the insider witnesses. These included radio operators, describing orders given from the secret communications center in Mr. Taylor’s mansion, and members of the president’s security force who said they witnessed the movement of arms and ammunition to the rebels and attended high-level strategy sessions.

One of the most dramatic accounts came from Joseph Marzah, a longtime associate of Mr. Taylor’s. He described himself as Mr. Taylor’s onetime chief of operations and head of a death squad, now an affluent businessman. He said that African peacekeepers were killed and eaten by Mr. Taylor’s militiamen and that weapons were easily smuggled. Four other witnesses also referred to the ritualistic eating of enemy flesh by Liberian combatants.

Mr. Marzah, known as Zigzag, spoke of the ease with which weapons were moved to Sierra Leone from Liberia during the Taylor government, despite an arms embargo. He said that Nigerian peacekeepers at the airport in Monrovia, the Liberian capital, were bribed and the weapons were transported in the peacekeepers’ vehicles.

He became angry as the defense lawyer repeatedly insisted that he had no close contact with Mr. Taylor. Stung, Mr. Marzah blurted out that he and Mr. Taylor belonged to the same secret society and had together eaten human hearts. With that he nervously crossed himself.

When the lawyer asked if he crossed himself because he had just lied under oath, Mr. Marzah said he had just broken the secrecy laws of his society.

Profile: Charles Taylor
July 14, 2009

By Al Jazeera, Doha, Qatar

Jul. 14–DOHA, Qatar — Charles Taylor, the former Liberian leader, is considered by some in Africa to be a man of many faces.

To his supporters, he is a Baptist lay preacher who drifted into nationalist politics while studying economics in the US. To others, he is a rebel leader who later became president in Liberia’s first democratic elections.

But he is most likely to be remembered as the first former African head of state to face an international tribunal on charges of crimes against humanity.

In 2003, the Special Court for Sierra Leone (SCSL), an independent judicial body established with United Nations Security Council backing, issued a 17-count war crimes indictment against Taylor for his role in the 1996-2002 civil war which took place there.

The indictment charges that Taylor had used his power and influence in Liberia to support rebel groups who committed atrocities against civilian populations in neighbouring Sierra Leone.

The charges include knowingly supporting, directing and effectively commanding rebel factions, such as the Revolutionary United Front (RUF), who committed “acts of terror, murder, sexual violence, including rape and sexual slavery, physical violence, including amputations, the conscription of child soldiers, enslavement and pillage”.

Prosecutors say that Taylor used the so-called “blood diamonds” trade in Sierra Leone to arm the rebel factions, destabilise its government and boost his regional influence.

The UN estimates that about 120,000 people were killed during the civil war.

Taylor has pleaded not guilty to 11 counts of war crimes and crimes against humanity, including conscripting child soldiers and sexual slavery.

His defence team has argued that the case against their client is “political” and that the SCSL is “a political institution controlled by states opposed to Taylor’s policies”.

Rise to power

The US-educated Taylor entered the world of politics when he led a demonstration in front of the Liberian Mission to the UN in New York City and publicly debated William Tolbert, the then-president of Liberia, in 1979.

In 1980, Taylor returned to Monrovia, the Liberian capital, after a bloody coup d’etat led by Samuel K Doe, an indigenous army sergeant, deposed and killed Tolbert.

Doe appointed Taylor, who is of mixed indigenous and freed American slave (known as Americo-Liberian) heritage, to the post of director of the General Services Agency, a body which controlled much of the state budget.

But in 1983, Taylor fled Liberia for the US after being accused of embezzling nearly $1m of state funds. In 1984, he was arrested and jailed in the US, but while fighting an extradition order, he managed to escape with four other inmates.

Although they were later caught, he disappeared only to resurface in 1985 in the Ivory Coast, where he had begun to amass men, material and money to return and unseat Doe from power in Monrovia.

In late 1989, he slipped back into Liberia with a token force of 100 men, known then as the National Patriotic Front of Liberia (NPFL). His mixed heritage allowed him to appeal to both Americo and indigenous Liberians.

Taylor also made use of long-harboured animosity between Doe and neighbouring countries such as Burkina Faso and the Ivory Coast, who supplied the rebel leader with arms and funding.

Targeting Monrovia

By July 2, 1990, Taylor’s 10,000-strong army surrounded Monrovia. As the conflict dragged on, the NPFL splintered into several breakaway groups which led to factional fighting and all-out civil war.

It was during this time that news of widespread slaughter and massacres against ethnic groups began to surface.

As the fighting intensified, Nigeria proposed the creation of an armed peace-keeping force, Ecomog, which despite several setbacks was able to broker a ceasefire that led to the country’s first democratic elections.

Taylor was elected president in free and fair elections, though he was accused of intimidating voters.

However, the country had already become fragmented. According to the UN, some 200,000 people had been killed and 800,000 been made refugees in nearly eight years of civil war.

Losing control

In 1999, war broke out again as opposition to his rule mounted and Taylor began to lose control of the country.

Things worsened for the embattled leader when Nigeria led the chorus of neighbouring states who accused Taylor of fomenting the civil war in Sierra Leone by selling weapons to rebel groups in exchange for diamonds smuggled out of the war-torn country.

In March 2003, the SCSL charged Taylor with crimes against humanity.

As he began to lose more control in Liberia, Taylor agreed to resign his post as president in exchange for the deployment of US peacekeepers in Monrovia.

He was then granted asylum in Nigeria. It would be another three years before he was handed over to the UN war crimes tribunal in Sierra Leone.

Although it is the first such international tribunal to be established in the same country where the crimes were committed, Taylor has been on trial at The Hague since June 2007 for fear that his presence in Freetown, the capital of Sierra Leone, could destabilise the region.

His defence team is expected to open their case in The Hague on July 13, 2009.

Taylor will take the stand as the first witness for the defence.

Google Buzz
Did you like this? If so, please bookmark it,
tell a friend
about it, and subscribe to this blog RSS feed.
  • Share/Bookmark

Bloody BLING! How long can this circus stay in one town, Damn ?

Why is this circus still under a tent ?

The Kimberly Process is a Joke – the way Zimbabwe deals with the organizations’ rules.  look at the situation – Zimbabweans are starving;  yet they are being forced to mine diamonds.  the diamonds are exported Around the kimberly process.  netting pure profit for whomever they are smuggled for, or by.  hmmmmm can you say, Moe and Mugs ??

Seriously take a look at this lil tidbit, which made my stomach turn over

It is estimated that the diamonds could be worth $200 million a month to the cash-strapped country, but the Mining Development Corporation claimed in 2007 that it was made $15 million from gem exports.

Seriously, Somebody send in some of Abacha’s Left Over Nigerian Viagara; and a buncha them  Swazi Dancin Heffas.  I bet we can get them two stooges to show up,  without their condoms RET TO MOONWALK.. they may invite Mswati and Zuma - HOT DOG !!!!

Damn, Who died and left these two bozos in charge ?  really doh, smh

to the people of Zimbabwe I dedicate a tune :

Michael Jackson – THEY DONT REALLY CARE ABOUT US


The Associated Press: Rights group: Abuse in Zimbabwe diamond fields.

Rights group: Abuse in Zimbabwe diamond fields

JOHANNESBURG (AP) — Human Rights Watch said Friday that Zimbabwe’s armed forces have taken over diamond fields in the east and killed more than 200 people, forcing children to search for the gems and beating villagers who get in the way.

Zimbabwe’s deputy mining minister, Murisi Zwizwai, denied the allegations and said the military is there to secure the area.

More than 100 witnesses, miners, police officers, soldiers and children were interviewed for the Human Rights Watch report titled “Diamonds in the Rough.” It details allegations of human rights abuses by Zimbabwean armed forces in their attempt to control access to the precious gems.

The New York-based group said researchers had gathered evidence of mass graves and accounts of an incident last year when military helicopters fired at miners, while armed soldiers on the ground chased villagers from the area.

There are hundreds of victims of human rights abuses that are unwilling to come forward for fear of the military,” Zimbabwe researcher Dewa Mavhinga said.

The report also alleges that some of the income from the diamond fields is going to officials of President Robert Mugabe’s ZANU-PF party, long accused of trampling on human rights and democracy in the southern African country.

The international human rights watchdog is calling on Zimbabwe’s coalition government, formed in February, to stop the alleged abuses and to prosecute those responsible.


It also is urging the international body that governs the global diamond industry to press Zimbabwe, a participant, to end the illegal trade in Marange diamonds. The Kimberley Process Certification Scheme, established in 2002, aims to stem the flow of “blood diamonds” being used to fund fighting across Africa. Participants are forced to certify the origins of the diamonds being traded. This assures consumers that by purchasing diamonds they are not financing war and human rights abuses.

Kenneth Roth, executive director of Human Rights Watch, said the group is calling for the definition of blood diamonds to be broadened to include gems mined through “repression and violent abuses” by governments.

The Marange diamond fields were discovered in 2006 — at the height of Zimbabwe’s political, economic and humanitarian crisis. Villagers rushed to the area and began finding diamonds close to the surface. Mining is now managed by Zimbabwe’s Mining Development Corporation under protection of the military.

It is estimated that the diamonds could be worth $200 million a month to the cash-strapped country, but the Mining Development Corporation claimed in 2007 that it was made $15 million from gem exports.

Zwizwai, the Zimbabwean deputy minister, said the country did not have the money to fence off the area and so was using the military to secure the diamond fields.

He said there had been no deaths by the military but that there had been “skirmishes” among the illegal diggers, which resulted in three reported deaths and eight arrests.

“The special operation by security forces has been successful as evidenced by (the) order and sanity which now prevails in the Marange area,” he told The Associated Press on the sidelines of a Kimberley Process meeting in neighboring Namibia.

Associated Press Writer Rodrick Mukumbira in Windhoek, Namibia contributed to this report.

Google Buzz
Did you like this? If so, please bookmark it,
tell a friend
about it, and subscribe to this blog RSS feed.
  • Share/Bookmark

Bloody Sierra Leone punks GUILTY – Charles Taylors’ Balls Roll Next;

FINALLY !


This gives you a short view of what Charled Taylor Caused to Happen in Sierra Leone; he cost them an entire Generation.

He btw, is on trial in the Hague for his crimes, and as of yet has not been found guilty. we are sure that after all the testimony, he is convicted. who will kill him is yet to be decided. there is no need for a lottery, because his heart will collapse under the weight in little to no time.

he is a walking dead man

Global Witness Says Charles Taylor Received 1M to Harbor Al Qaeda Operatives in Liberia

New Liberian Mambu James Kpargoi, Jr.,Monrovia

Liberia’s former President Charles Taylor received a US$1 million payment for arranging to harbor two al Qaeda operatives in Liberia soon after the September 11 terrorist attacks on the United States, Global Witness said.


The men, Ahmed Khalfan Ghailani and Fazul Abdullah Mohammed, both of whom were on the FBI’s Most Wanted List of Terrorists, Global Witness said, were hidden at the Gbartala Base in Bong County.


Testifying Friday at the Economic Crimes Hearing of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Liberia (TRC), Patrick Alley, one of the directors of Global Witness said Al Qaeda’s interest in Liberia and Sierra Leone goes back to the late 1990s, when the Taylor-backed RUF rebels were in control of the lucrative diamond fields of Sierra Leone.

Global Witness said in 1998, soon after the attacks on US missions in Africa, a senior al Qaeda financial officer, Abdullah Ahmed Abdullah, arrived in Monrovia. The group said that Abdullah was introduced to RUF leaders including Sam “Maskita” Bockarie, by Ibrahim Bah.


According to Mr. Alley, the same two al Qaeda operatives traveled to Liberia in March 1999 in order to establish a diamonds for arms deal and spent a few days scouting the RUF diamond fields in Sierra Leone, as well as meeting with Bockarie and giving him US$100,000 in cash for a parcel of diamonds.


“By January 2001, employees of Aziz Nassour, who is associated with the Antwerp based diamond trading company ASA Diam, had established control over RUF diamonds in exchange for arms, and his control continued until November 2001.”


Mr. Alley said Nassour along with his business associate and cousin Samih Osailly, were named in international criminal investigations as being involved in dealing in diamonds for al Qaeda but all three men denied the allegations. But he said that Nassour, though denying any illegal wrongdoing, admitted to being involved in the diamond trade in Sierra Leone and elsewhere and also admitted to attempting to do other business deals with President Taylor.


“In fact Nassour and Taylor are quite well acquainted. Eyewitnesses put Nassour and Taylor together for a July 2001 meeting at Harper Port in Maryland County near the border with Cote d’I voire, where much of Liberia’s illicit weaponry arrives. There Nassour allegedly gave Taylor US$200,00 to ensure his support for the ongoing diamond dealing,” he said.


He said Global Witness research and investigations found that since 1993, al Qaeda was buying diamonds to make money and to commodify its assets, shifting them away from traditional bank accounts that are subjected to surveillance by financial authorities and are under threat of being frozen to less traceable commodities such as diamonds.


Under the theme: “Economic Crimes, Corruption and the Conflict in Liberia: Policy Options for an Emerging Democracy and sustainable peace,” the weeklong hearing addressed the contribution of economic crimes to the conflict including corruption and the illicit exploitation of natural resources.


The hearing also discussed the correlation between the extractive industry and the fueling of the conflict and appropriate policies aimed at reversing the unauthorized exploitation of the natural resources by individuals, groups and the government for purposes external to the national good.


Pursuant to the TRC Act of 2005, the commission is mandated to investigate gross human rights violations and violations of international humanitarian law as well as abuses that occurred, including massacres, sexual violations, murder, extra-judicial killings and economic crimes, such as the exploitation of natural or public resources to perpetuate armed conflicts during the period January 1979 to October 14, 2003.


The commission is mandated to determine whether these were isolated incidents or part of a systematic pattern; establishing the antecedents, circumstances, factors and context of such violations and abuses; and determining those responsible for the commission of the violations and abuses and their motives as well as their impact on victims.


we will be watching this trial and reporting on it’s outcome, when there is one.

we commanded him out of Liberia and we will not rest until he is put to rest, as his victims were – bludgeoned and limbs hacked off; dismembered and disembowled; he will die and we will live to see it. there is justice, and God Shall Deliver it, soon.

This is the Video of Salma Hayek Breastfeeding a hungry malnourished Baby in Sierra Leone, on her recent fact finding trip

She says her baby would be proud to have her mom share her milk with another hungry baby. We Applaud Salma because this is the essence of healing – a Mothers Milk to Soothe the Cries of a Hungry Nation…

From left to right: Issa Sesay, Morris Kallon and Augustine Gbao at the court in Freetown

The RUF trio committed atrocities during the 1991-2001 civil war

An international tribunal has found three Sierra Leone rebels guilty of war crimes and crimes against humanity.

RUF leaders Issa Sesay, 38, and Morris Kallon, 45, were convicted of 16 of the 18 charges, while Augustine Gbao, 60, was found guilty on 14 of the counts.

The Freetown trial of the RUF rebel leaders, related to Sierra Leone’s 10-year civil war, began in mid-2004.

Many RUF victims in the court sighed with relief at the verdicts. Sentences will be decided at a later date.

The BBC’s Umaru Fofana at the court in Freetown said that as the verdicts were delivered, Sesay looked very serious and Kallon, clad in a smart light green suit, could have been mistaken for one of the lawyers, while Gbao buried his face in his hands and looked very dejected.

The last case to be held at the special court had heard how the rebel leaders were involved in the rape, mutilation and killings of civilians.

Sierra Leone child amputee

Tens of thousands of civilians had limbs, noses or ears chopped off

The three committed atrocities during the 1991-2001 civil war as senior commanders of the Revolutionary United Front (RUF).

On Wednesday the judges concluded the rebel chiefs “significantly contributed” to a joint criminal enterprise with former Liberian President Charles Taylor to control the diamond fields of Sierra Leone to finance their warfare.

They were also found guilty of forced marriage – the enslavement that countless young girls suffered when their villages were raided and they were forced to “marry” a rebel.

‘Horrors’

The convictions mark the first time the forced marriage charge has been successfully handed down in an international court of law.

The trial heard harrowing tales from 75 prosecution witnesses of rapes and killings at the hands of the RUF.

FROM THE BBC WORLD SERVICE

The three rebels chiefs were initially indicted along with RUF founder Foday Sankoh, a close ally of Mr Taylor. But Sankoh died in custody before the case ever came to trial.

Tactics favoured by the rebels included amputating hands and arms or carving the initials RUF into the bodies of their victims.

The RUF was notorious for using the so-called Small Boys Units – child soldiers forcibly recruited and issued with AK-47 assault rifles – who had a reputation for particular cruelty among the civilian population.

By the time the conflict ended, some 120,000 people had been killed while tens of thousands were left mutilated, their arms, legs, noses or ears cut off.

Sierra Leone expert Gregory Gordon, a US law professor who has worked as a prosecutor in Africa, told the BBC’s Network Africa programme: “When we think about blood diamonds, when we think about people having their hands chopped off, when we think about child soldiers and sexual slavery and forced marriages – all the horrors of the civil war in Sierra Leone, we think about the Revolutionary United Front.”

The only trial still ongoing before the UN-backed Special Court for Sierra Leone is that of Mr Taylor, whose case has been moved to The Hague for security reasons.

He faces 11 counts of war crimes and crimes against humanity.

The Sierra Leone conflict was depicted in the 2006 film Blood Diamond, starring Djimon Hounsou, Leonardo DiCaprio and Jennifer Connelly.

Prosecutor Says Former Liberian President Charles Taylor May Go Free


24 February 2009

Former Liberian President Charles Taylor sits courtroom prior to hearing of witnesses in trial against Taylor in The Hague, 08 Jan 2008
Former Liberian President Charles Taylor sits in courtroom prior to hearing of witnesses in trial in The Hague, 08 Jan 2008

The chief prosecutor in the trial of former Liberian president Charles Taylor says Taylor may go free because of a funding shortage at the court trying him for war crimes.

Reuters news agency quotes prosecutor Stephen Rapp as saying donations to the Special Court for Sierra Leone are down because of the worldwide economic recession.

Rapp says if the court runs out of money, it is possible judges will have to release Taylor.

The former Liberian leader is charged with 11 counts of war crimes and crimes against humanity for alleged actions in Sierra Leone during that country’s civil war.

Prosecutors say Taylor’s forces murdered or mutilated thousands of civilians, and kidnapped children for use as soldiers and sex slaves.

Taylor has pleaded not guilty to the charges.

He is being tried at The Hague, in the Netherlands, because of fears that Taylor’s presence in Sierra Leone could spark unrest in West Africa.

The prosecution concluded its case against Taylor last month.

The U.N.-backed Special Court for Sierra Leone was set up to try alleged war criminals from Sierra Leone’s 1991 to 2002 civil war.

The Reuters report quotes the tribunal’s registrar, Herman von Hebel, as saying important donors such as Ireland, France and Germany have cut their contributions this year.

He says the court is seeking out other donors in the Middle East in hopes of raising $30 million to continue operating through 2010.

A Film About Liberian Women “Pray the Devil Back to Hell” Premieres in Minnesota

Feb 26, 2009 – The Liberian

Minneapolis / St. Paul, MN (February 26, 2009) – The award-winning film Pray the Devil Back to Hell opens for a limited engagement in Minneapolis at the Lagoon Cinema beginning this weekend.
As at the national premiere in New York, The Advocates will moderate post-film Q&A sessions at the 7:10 p.m. showings on Saturday, February 28th and Wednesday, March 4th to discuss the documentary and issues of women’s rights, truth and reconciliation in post-war societies.
Pray the Devil Back to Hell is a brilliant film chronicling the remarkable story of the courageous Liberian women who came together to end a bloody civil war and bring peace to their shattered country. After nearly 20 years of egregious violations of human rights, including arbitrary killing, torture, use of child combatants, sexual violence, and destruction of property, a peace movement emerged.
Thousands of women – ordinary mothers, grandmothers, aunts and daughters, both Christian and Muslim – began to come together to pray for peace. Armed only with white T-shirts and the courage of their convictions, they staged a silent protest outside of the Presidential Palace and demanded a resolution to the country’s civil war. Their actions became a critical element in bringing about an agreement during the stalled peace talks.

A story of sacrifice, unity, and transcendence, Pray the Devil Back to Hell honors the strength and perseverance of these women of Liberia. Inspiring, uplifting, and most of all motivating, it is a compelling testimony of how grassroots activism can alter the history of nations. The film has won several awards, including Best Documentary in the Tribeca Film Festival. It has received praise from movie critics from Los Angeles to Boston, including an excellent review in The New York Times (See Review).

This story is especially pertinent to Minnesota, home to the largest population of Liberians outside of West Africa (See Flyer with Detailed info.).

Based in Minneapolis, The Advocates for Human Rights has worked with the Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC) of Liberia for more than two years to engage the Liberian Diaspora in the United States, the United Kingdom, and West Africa in the TRC process.
The film is also being screened in Liberia and the Democratic Republic of Congo in March, 2009.
Moderated by Advocates’ Deputy Director, Jennifer Prestholdt, the post-screening panel will include Ahmed K. Sirleaf of the Advocates, and two other Liberian women in Minnesota.
Google Buzz
Did you like this? If so, please bookmark it,
tell a friend
about it, and subscribe to this blog RSS feed.
  • Share/Bookmark

Africa is so many faces; all at once – all different, all wanting change

Today we bring you back to reality with the news. why do we all have a piece of technology that fuels war ?

because we are kept in the dark by the very people we pay monthly, to tell us the facts. why do we not have accountability on such an important issue ? I theorize it’s got alot to do with who’s making the rules, and what’s key to their platform.

Blood Diamonds were such a long journey to conflict designation; but we can make it happen again with the mineral components inside our electronics – Coltan, specifically; if we want it to happen. We know change is possible, and with the present momentum of change against adversity, we should lobby hard for this quickly.

please take a moment and get acquainted with the facts. decide how you feel about the blood that is running through your electronics. make a conscious effort to recognize that our lives are bound to the lives of those who die for our convenience.  it’s time to realize the facts of life and live like each person’s life was equal.

We want to stand up and be counted. we know that you do to, so please take a moment and read these two important articles on the Conflict going on right now in Congo. understand how our dollars fuel this bloody war against the families of the Congo; to the tune of $20 Million A Month.

Think First - Don’t just buy another Phone, Pda or  Electronic until you know that it’s guts are your guts. stand on principle and refuse to fund the murder of innocent people. end this tribal war for dollars. tell our legislators and the global cellphone manufacturers and cell phone service providers that we do want change, and we want it now.

Make Change a Part of Your Life, Daily.

~RE

In an exclusive TV interview with AFPTV, Democratic Republic of Congo rebel chief Laurent Nkunda has threatened to drive the government from power unless it holds direct talks on his demands.

How The Mobile Phone in Your Pocket is Helping to Pay For The Civil War in Congo

(commondreams.org)

by Mike Pflanz

GOMA – After two hours, drenched in sweat, he tugs on a cord tied to his waist and is pulled back to the surface, carrying with him a 30 kilogram sack of raw columbium-tantalite ore.

[More than 80 per cent of the world's coltan is in Africa, and 80 percent of that lies in territory controlled by Congo's various ragtag rebel groups, armed militia and its corrupt and underfunded national army.]More than 80 per cent of the world’s coltan is in Africa, and 80 percent of that lies in territory controlled by Congo’s various ragtag rebel groups, armed militia and its corrupt and underfunded national army.

Few people have heard of this rare mineral, known as coltan, even though millions of people in the developed world rely on it. But global demand for the mineral, and a handful of other materials used in everything from cellphones to soup tins, is keeping the armies of Congo’s ceaseless wars fighting.More than 80 per cent of the world’s coltan is in Africa, and 80 percent of that lies in territory controlled by Congo’s various ragtag rebel groups, armed militia and its corrupt and underfunded national army.

Despite Friday’s ceasefire summit in the Kenyan capital Nairobi, and visits to Congo by earnest international politicians and diplomats, there will be no peace until the economic forces driving the conflict are addressed, experts warn.

“Until now, this question has been avoided on the basis that it is too sensitive or could derail peace talks,” said Patrick Alley, director of Global Witness, a British charity which has investigated the militarisation of Congo’s mineral trade.

“That is a short-sighted view. If international dialogues continue to ignore this critical aspect of the conflict, they will not find long-term solutions.”

In Congo’s North Kivu province, scene of the current bloody conflict, the supply chain that links the sweating miner to the mobile telephone in your pocket starts around Masisi district, the rebel-held area 110 miles northeast of the provincial capital, Goma.

Back up on the surface again, the miner hands his sack of ore to his shift boss, who pays him less than a dollar per kilogramme. Some mines also use child labour, often for no pay at all.

The rocks are then packed into even heavier 50kg loads and passed to porters, who hoist them on to their backs and set off, in flip flops or Wellington boots, for the two-day walk through the mountains to the town of Walikale.

There, the ore is sold once again, now for just over a dollar a kilogramme, to a middleman known as a negociant. He consolidates several loads and calls in an aircraft to land at the town’s grass airstrip, collect the rocks and fly them to Goma.

Dotted across Goma, behind high walls and locked gates, there are hundreds of small-scale traders called comptoirs. Men in dusty overalls sit with large piles of rocks in front of them, using a trained eye to scan scan for the chunks likely to yield the best-quality product, samples of which they then grind to assess its coltan purity and how much to pay the negociant accordingly. In an office to the rear, the comptoir director sits in front of his laptop, scanning coltan and cassiterite prices on the internet site of the London Metal Exchange.

“Things have progressed a bit today because we are able to see what is the best price instantly, rather than having to guess as we did before the internet,” said Joseph Nzanzu, a comptoir director in Goma.

“But still the process, the negociants, how they come to us with the ore, how we grade it and argue over the price, this is the way it has been for decades.”

Gathering hundreds of kilogrammes together, the comptoir loads the ore on to trucks which set off for Mombasa on Kenya’s Indian Ocean coast, five days’ hard driving away through Rwanda, Uganda and Kenya.

From here, cargo ships carry the coltan to processing plants in the Far East, although it is also traded as a commodity on the London Metal Exchange and in Belgium, Congo’s former colonial power. The ore, still hunks of rock just as it was when it came out of the mine, is ground down and refined to extract tantalum, a heat resistant powder which is sold to firms making the capacitors which are found in mobile telephones and other electrical devices.

Finally, the equipment manufacturers buy the capacitors, without which their goods would not work. From North and South Kivu, a total of 428 metric tonnes of coltan was exported in 2007, according to the provincial ministry of mines, worth around £2 million. But these figures are notoriously inaccurate, and take no account of illegally smuggled minerals, likely to make up almost as much again.

There is nothing illegal in buying or using coltan, despite concerns that some of profits from the trade in the Congo helps fund its myriad armed groups. All of the big electronics manufacturers say that they make every effort to ensure that the components in their products are from legitimate mines, either in Congo or in other coltan-producing countries including Brazil and Argentina.

But in Congo’s anarchic environment, it is impossible for customers to know for sure that the tantalum in their mobile phone, DVD player, PlayStation or desktop computer did not come from a rebel-held mine. Buyers say that ore from these mines is mixed with that from legitimate mines, and they cannot tell which is which. There is no equivalent of the Kimberley Process, the international system which certifies that diamonds are from conflict-free areas.

The links between Congo’s vast riches and its blood-stained history stretch back to the Belgian colonial era, when King Leopold II forced labourers onto his rubber plantations and ordered his agents to chop off the hands of workers who failed to fulfil their harvest quotas.

But throughout the latter half of the 1990s and the beginning of this decade, as Congo descended into two wars, its mineral wealth began directly to stoke its conflict. At the height of a coltan price boom in 2001, the UN estimated that rebel groups were earning $20 million a month from mineral exploitation, though the market price has since fallen.

A 2003 United Nations investigation into the illegal exploitation of natural resources accused both Rwanda and Uganda of prolonging their armed incursions into Congo in order to continue their plunder. Peace was supposed to have come to the region that year. But in the east, the rebels and armed militia remained and proliferated, extending their reach into the mines opened by a series of state mining companies and then abandoned as war swept the country.

Today, these armed groups earn their money either by directly controlling the mines themselves, or by taxing lorries as they pass through their territories. Alongside them, Congo’s own army runs various mines and its officers pocket the profits.

There have been calls for an international embargo of the trade in the country’s minerals. But that would only hurt its poorest citizens, who have little else to do to earn money, said Mr Nzanzu.

Instead, according to Mr Alley of Global Witness, buyers must double efforts to ensure that they do not trade in any mineral tainted by contact with any of Congo’s armed groups.

“For as long as there are buyers who are willing to trade, directly or indirectly, with groups responsible for grave human rights abuses, there is no incentive for these groups to lay down their arms,” he said.

It is not acceptable for buyers to claim they do not or cannot know where the minerals come from. They have a responsibility to find out exactly where the minerals were produced and by whom.

“If there is any likelihood that they have passed through the hands of armed groups or army units, they should refuse to buy them.”

URL: Shared heritage
(bbc news)

Fisherman on Ocho Rios beach, Jamaica

The BBC’s African Perspective programme is investigating what life is like for some of an estimated 20 million Africans who live in the diaspora.

Nick Davis in Kingston finds out what made some Africans voluntarily make the former slave island of Jamaica their home.

Christopher Columbus landed on the beach at Rio Bueno on Jamaica’s north coast in 1494 and forever changed the history of this island.

The Spanish arrived and brought the Africans with them. They imported slaves throughout their 160-year stay and the practice continued under British rule.

Some of my students sometimes don’t seem very proud to be called African, they associate the place with poverty, starvation
Anthropologist Barry Chevannes,
University of the West Indies

Jamaica’s national motto is “Out of many, one people” – a description of the island’s multi-ethnic background.

But with over 90% of the 2.6m population being black, the country looks African.

But does it feel African?

“It looked like home to me when I first arrived. Sometimes I’d make a mistake and speak to people in my Ghanaian language and then I’d suddenly realise, this isn’t a Ghana,” says Sophie Dawes who grew up in what was formerly called the Gold Coast, now Ghana.

‘Jamaica heads, Nigeria tails’

The 74-year-old grandmother met her husband – a well known Jamaican academic and writer, Neville Dawes – when she was at university in Ghana. They eventually moved to the West Indies with their young family more than 40 years ago.

Nigerian Olalekan Abbass
We basically tossed a coin and said where do we go? Jamaica heads, Nigeria tails
Nigerian Olalekan Abbass

For Olalekan Abbass who came from Abeokuta in Nigeria’s Ogun state it was a similar story. He met and married his wife Arlene, who is Jamaican, in London but they had a dilemma.

“We basically tossed a coin and said where do we go? Jamaica heads, Nigeria tails. It was heads and we came down.”

Jamaicans have a strong connection with Africa.

The look to the motherland started in the years of slavery. Traditions, rituals, religious beliefs and even language were all reinforced by the waves of Africans shipped in to keep the island’s sugar plantations going.

But after emancipation, it was not really until Marcus Garvey during the 1920s and 1930s that an island with wider black consciousness took hold.

He told his supporters to “look to Africa”, and his message and his calls for repatriation were taken up by descendants of African slaves and became the cornerstone of a new religion, Rastafari.

Miles away

“I was in college in America and whilst studying I became friends with a good brother, he would say to me why are you acting Jamaican, but I would say to him, why are you acting like an African?” says Makonnen who came from Guinea Bisseau and is a follower of Rastafari.

Vendor at food market

African and Caribbean people share a love of food

Makonnen’s dreadlocks are covered under a wicker hat.

He is always well dressed but this is a special day. He is in a silk shirt.

The face of Ethiopia’s Emperor, Haille Sellasse is proudly emblazoned across it.

Today would’ve been the 116th birthday of His Imperial Majesty – the most important date for Rastafarians.

He works as a herbalist and a counsellor out of a health food store in Ocho Rios, a busy resort town on Jamaica’s north coast but he has taken some time off to show me what reminds him most of home.

We head to a little fishing village. As we arrive the boats are heading back from sea. A scene that Makonnen says is repeated thousands of miles away in Africa.

Shared love of food

“The whole scenario here is about the fisherman – they go out in these little locally made boats, they bring in the catch and it has been cleaned.

AFRICAN PERSPECTIVE
Kenyan Victoria Njau [Photo: DAVE MCKEEN]
I know what it means to everyone who would love to be in America. I had to use my opportunity to better myself, my family and my village
Kenyan Victoria Njau in the US

“The way the huts are built, look it’s just like Africa. They cook the sweetest seafood right here and down the road they turn cornmeal into what we call fufu.”

A love of food is something that both African and Caribbean people share. And for the people who have made Jamaica home, many of the dishes are not that foreign.

“The food is very similar to what we eat in Nigeria. There’s a little difference in how it’s prepared but it’s so close; the ingredients are the same. I went to the doctor the other day he said you need to change your diet.

“I said change it to what? Everything they have here is the same as what we eat back home,” says Nigerian Olalaken Abass.

“Nigerians talk about nyam – to eat, and Jamaicans say the same word in Patois [Jamaican creole language] so there’s lot of similarities in how we speak,” says Sophie Dawes

Like wildfire

trader

Jamaicans are slowly identifying with African culture

But despite some of the cultural and historical links between Africa and Jamaica some people do not want to accept the link.

“Some of my students sometimes don’t seem very proud to be called African, they associate the place with poverty, starvation. They often think who’d wanna be an African,” says Barry Chevannes, an anthropologist at the University of the West Indies.

But Olalaken says that the people in Jamaica need to look beyond the poverty, corruption and HIV and Aids headlines to the real Africa.

By doing so, they will be able to more easily embrace their African roots.

“There needs to be a little bit more of an introduction to the real African culture. Recently the Jamaican public have been watching African movies which have caught on like wildfire – they haven’t seen things like this before and slowly they are identifying with African culture.”

and in Africa many wish they could find the peace and comfort found in Jamaica’s island breezes..

URL: Call for affirmative action – European Africans Wants It Now


Call for affirmative action

Straits Times, Singapore -

the French translation of Obama’s campaign slogan ‘Yes We Can’, and said that the African-American’s ‘election illustrated by a cruel contrast the failings
Video: ‘Obamamania’ in France – Nov 3 2008


Obama supporters in France set sights on diversity at home
French blacks watch Obama … and dream

Google Buzz
Blog Widget by LinkWithinDid you like this? If so, please bookmark it,
tell a friend
about it, and subscribe to this blog RSS feed.
  • Share/Bookmark
  
Get Adobe Flash playerPlugin by wpburn.com wordpress themes